DARWINIST PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES--4th Part
RESİM ALTI YAZILARI
s.16
The way that a lemur fossil and a Bonobo monkey can be misrepresented as ancestors of man in the Darwinist press is truly shocking. Darwinists have had to apologize for this shameless propaganda.
Ida
s.17
The Ardi and Ida appeared under these headlines in part of the press.
The aim was to maintain evolutionary propaganda with false news reports.
s.18
Darwinist confessions regarding the Ida deception
Charles Beard, a paleontologist from the Johns Hopkins University Carnegie Museum of Natural History: "This fossil is not as close to monkeys, apes, and humans as we are being led to believe."1
Duke University paleontologist Richard Kay admits that, "there is no scientific analysis to prove that Ida is a missing link," IN OTHER WORDS, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR IT AT ALL.2
Timesonline carried the following admission: "Attenborough ... was just one element of the media circus turning Ida into humanity’s newest and best link with its ancient past." "Such finds are usually unveiled to the world through the sober pages of an academic journal, but for Ida nothing less than a glittering press conference at the American Museum of Natural History in New York would do. Later the scientists who studied Ida outlined the details of their research. Their pronouncements were just as extravagant."3
Richard Foley, a professor of human evolution at Cambridge University, said that, "it is ‘meaningless’ to describe this creature as a missing link."4
"Dr. Simons phoned me for the first time in 10 years to share his outrage about this MALARKEY and, for the first time in a decade, I agree with him,” said Beard last week. “...The roll-out was extraordinary and it is now clear that the scientists were under pressure to meet the showbusiness deadlines."
Simons had said: "It’s absurd and dangerous. … This is all bad science... Darwinius is a wonderful fossil, but IT IS NOT A MISSING LINK OF ANY KIND. IT REPRESENTS A DEAD END IN EVOLUTION."
1 The Missing Link? Nightline, ABC News television, May 20, 2009. The Missing Link? Nightline, ABC News television, May 20, 2009
2 Gibbons, A. "Revolutionary" Fossil Fails to Dazzle Paleontologists. ScienceNOW Daily News. Posted on sciencenow.sciencemag.org May 19, 2009, accessed May 20, 2009
3 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6350095.ece
4 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6350095.ece
s.19
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
www.guardian.co.uk/science/
The Ida fraud was launched with a huge fanfare in the press, and Isa was intensively used for Darwinist propaganda purposes. The missing link was shamelessly maintained until the fraud was exposed.
s.20
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
://blogs.abcnews.com/scienceandsociety/
www.nature.com/news/
Newsweek, 23 August 1999
New Scientist, 09.09.2006
News, 8 April 2006
s.21
Time, 3 May 1999
Science & Vie, October 1999
New Scientist, 1 Jan 2005
Reports of this kind, such as the supposed “discovery of evolution’s missing link,” are one of the main techniques that Darwinists generally employ to spread their propaganda. Since Darwinists have no evidence to support their idea of evolution, they seek to maintain the same spell over people by fraudulently persisting with such headlines. At times when they have suffered severe defeats in particular, they show people the “missing link discovered” captions from Darwinist publications and support that lie with illustrations suggestive of evolution. They have been using that hypnotic technique for the last 150 years. Millions of people reading these reports over the years have imagined that evolution and the missing link genuinely exist. Until the true face of the evolution deception was unmasked through the works of Harun Yahya, that is...
s.22
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
Time, 3 May 1999
New Scientist, July 2001
Focus, July 2002
New Scientist, 11 September 2004
Time, 7 May 2001
www.metro.co.uk/news/23906-four-legged-dolphin-found
The Newyork Times National, 24 June 1998
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/11/06/dolphinlegs_ani.html
Time, 6 April 1998
s.23
Science & Vie, November 1998
New Scientist, 25 Jan 2003
News, 27 June 2005
The Australian, 5 April 2010
New Scientist, 09.09.2006
Newsweek, 23 August 1999
For someone who is unaware that evolution is a fraud, these reports in well-known newspaper, accompanied by fossil illustrations and scientific terminology and formulae may well be misleadingly convincing. The fact is, however, that all reports of a “missing link” are specious. THERE EXISTS NOT ONE SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL SUPPORTING EVOLUTION. No such missing link has ever been found, and it is impossible for one ever to be found. Because living things NEVER EVOLVED. ALLAH CREATED THEM ALL.
s.26
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
Scientific American, May 2002
Evolution on island outpaced that on the mainland
Birgün, 20 September 2006
Males wore “decorations” 50,000 years ago
Star, 12. 01. 2010
The formula of evolution discovered
Hürriyet, 03. 09. 1999
Man is not monogamous, but a serial monogamist
Hürriyet, 10 04. 2001
s.27
Stone Age man was also “self”-ish Star, 27. 02. 2009
Genetic map of “an evolutionary accident” produced
Birgün, 9 May 2008
Is “Indigo children” a new link in the evolutionary process?
Hürriyet, 17 May 2005
Science is anti-evolution and anti-Darwinist. Every branch of science definitively refutes evolution. The heaviest blow dealt to the theory of evolution in the 21st century came from science. But evolution amazingly still claims to be scientific. It uses science to disseminate its false propaganda. It tries to make its hypnosis more effective by sprinkling false news reports with scientific terminology. But the fact is that these scientific terminology and formulae in Darwinist publications have nothing to do with the reports themselves.
s.28
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2001/mar/18/education.highereducation
Vertebrates have been speaking for 400 years
Birgün, 19 August 2008
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3225729/Stone-Age-man-took-drugs-say-scientists.html
The evolution of friendship
Birgün, 15 August 2005
Had it not been for schizophrenia, we would still be monkeys
Hürriyet, 20. 03. 2001
Even Stone Age man had a drug dependency!
Birgün, 20. 10. 2008
Men spoke first
Hürriyet Bilim, 12. 10. 2002
s.29
New Scientist, 26 June 2006
The marathon and evolution!
Evrensel, 24 October 2004
The Neanderthal inside us wants to dance!
Radikal, 02 June 2006
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/0674021924/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books
The aging clock has been set back
Hürriyet, 29. 04. 2000
Someone who is uninformed on the subject and looks at these false reports about evolution under such headlines may well form the impression from the captions and illustrations that he is dealing with scientific data emerging from various pieces of legitimate research. But all these reports are fictitious. No scientific research has produced any such data. The only conclusion emerging from scientific research is the fact that evolution never took place at any time in history. Indeed, it is the revelation of that fact before the eyes of the world that has most devastated Darwinists.
s.30
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
Man is a genetic error!
Radikal, 26 March 2004
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=latest-theory-human-body-hair
Researchers seeking an answer to “why human beings lost their fur.”
Cumhuriyet, 20 August 2003
Lice forced human beings to wear clothes
Hürriyet, 20 August 2003
Gestures are inherited, not social: Researchers emphasize that facial expressions stem from evolutionary genetic paths
Birgün, 19. 10. 2006
s.31
Science Vie, 01 Oct 2000
New Scientist, 16 October 1999
Is the “hmmmm” sound underwater the basis of speech? Radikal, 19. 07. 2008
The first murder was committed in the Stone Age
Hürriyet, 04 August 2009
New Scientist, 24 May 2008
The most beautiful woman 3 million years ago
Akşam, 16. 01. 2003
One of the distinguishing features of Darwinists is the way that they laugh at people and shamelessly impose their utterly ludicrous reports on them. Since Darwinists have been doing this and gathering support in this way for the last 150 years, they imagine they can persist in the same fraud now by making use of the press. But it is not impossible for them to succeed.
s.32
The cell that Darwin in the 19th century imagined to be a balloon filled with water, has actually turned out to be more complex than the city of New York, one of the 21st century’s greatest metropolises. It is impossible for a single protein inside the cell to form by chance, let alone the cell itself.
s.34
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2007/02/27-02.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1086928/Kangaroos-closely-related-humans-scientists-claim.html
Our ancestors were bird feed!
Radikal, 14 Jan 2006
Chimpanzees and man had a common forebear 4 billion years ago
Radikal, 25 February 2007
Our ancestor the germ
Hürriyet, 08. 03. 1998
Man is turned out to be 80% ox
Radikal, 25 April 2009
s.35
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/prehistoric_life/human/human_evolution/
http://io9.com/#!5083673/princeton-scientists-discover-proteins-that-control-evolution
Time, 23 August 1999
Time, 18 Oct 1999
http://www.selamta.net/Lucy.htm
Life is extraordinarily complex. A single cell is a whole living world, the details of which have still not been fully unraveled. Darwinists have suffered their worst defeat in the face of a single protein in the cell. They are unable to account for even a single protein. The reports of evolution that Darwinists manufacture using fields such as genetic research, genetics and DNA, are therefore hugely specious. The science of genetics has demolished evolution. The subject of the beginning of life has inflicted the worst collapse on Darwinists. No scientific research has ever produced any of the results claimed in Darwinist publications. All of the reports in question are fraudulent.
s.36
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
Scientific American, March 2003
Focus, Jul 2002
Scientific American, October 2003
Time, 18 Oct 1999
Time, 27 June 2005
Scientific American, April 1997
Newsweek, Feb 2003
s.37
Science Vie, Aout 1998
Time, 20 October 1996
Scientific American, Jan 2003
Stern, December 2004
All evolutionist claims are irrational and illogical. Small dinosaurs can ever suddenly turn into birds as they run along the ground. The fact it can run fast is not the only difference between a monkey and man. Neither anteaters nor worms nor bacteria are related to human beings. Life is far too complex to be explained with these fantastical Darwinist claims. Darwinists try to give the impression in the kind of headlines shown above that life is really very simple. Because they think that the simpler life is, the easier it will be for them to spread the idea that “everything came about by chance.” They have misled people with such conditioning for many years. But modern science that has shown the complexity in a single cell has now spelled the end of Darwinism.
s.38
IMAGINARY
The imaginary formula that Darwinists use to account for the complex structures and huge variety of life on Earth.
mud
time
change
natural events
s.39
SUPPOSITION
ALL LIFE
s.41
In terms of their complexity, sensitivity, symmetry, order, details, equipment and systems, living things are literally works of art. These works of art indicate the existence of a sublime Artist, the Might of our Lord Allah. Darwinists are perfectly well aware that all entities are created works of art. But they are reluctant to abandon their ideology. That is the main reason why they seek to disseminate their utterly ridiculous claims, in the full knowledge of how fraudulent they are.
s.42
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
Time, 17 April 2006
http://www.livescience.com/98-runner-high-jogging-separated-humans-apes.html
http://schansblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/we-evolved-from-fruit-flies-and.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/647139.stm
s.43
http://io9.com/#!5597276/meet-your-true-ancestor-the-segmented-worm
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2002-04/aaft-uoa040402.php
Philippines Daily, 09.08.2007
Sciences et Avenir, May 2003
It was easy to produce fictitious reports in the name of science in Darwin’s time. Because science was exceedingly primitive then. People really were able to believe, from newspaper headlines, that we are related to the fly, that chimpanzees are “our cousins” and that we are close relatives of the horse. However, science has challenged the theory of evolution in a way that Darwinists never expected. These ludicrous claims by Darwinists have been annihilated in the face of science. These propaganda techniques therefore merely disgrace Darwinists.
s.44
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
Time, 23 Dec 1996
Time, 29 March 1999
News, 11 June 2005
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=latest-theory-human-body-hair
s.45
Times of Malta, 11 August 2007
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/dec/29/evolution.science
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8012322.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6057734.stm
Darwinists want people to be ignorant and uninformed. They want to be able to mislead them with utterly nonsensical reports. They seek to condition them with the idea that imaginary formulae such as “time+chance+mud” are enough to account for the glorious variety and perfection in the living world. That is the terrible nonsense that Darwinism is. Headlines in the newspapers in question are their greatest weapon in spreading this foolish logic. They try to hypnotize people who are ignorant of the subject. It is largely through these false press reports that Darwinism has been able to maintain its dominion over the last 150 years.
s.47
Under the control of atheist masons, the major press frequently carries reports emphasizing the nonsense that is evolution.
s.48
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/786/first-land-vertebrates-may-have-suffocated
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2006/apr/06/evolution.fossils
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolution/7550033/Missing-link-between-man-and-apes-found.html
The Press, 10 August 2007
Science Vie, Jul 2003
s.49
New Scientist, 19 April 2008
Scientific American, May 2003
Science, 2 April 2004
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2008-04-24-trex-chicken-dna_N.htm
Ever since the time of Darwin, part of the major press has been given the task of disseminating Darwinist indoctrination. The Darwinists of the time were well aware that the theory of evolution would never be corroborated by any scientific evidence, but produced a Darwinist dictatorship as the result of systematic and organized activities and charged part of the major press with spreading the fraud. The press in question is still at work today. The only difference is that the Darwinist fraud they perpetrate has now been exposed.
s.52
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
Evolution approved at the molecular level
Radikal, 9 April 2006
FROM SEAWEED TO MAN
Bilim Teknik, September 1979
Now it is time for the organism
Cumhuriyet, 22 May 2010
http://www.pizaazz.com/2010/06/17/worlds-first-synthetic-organism/
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5409946/scientists_create_artificial_life_a.html
http://www.sinfest.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?p=326543&sid=94488980c2bf62284d4439842ba2e2f0
s.53
http://www.dailytech.com/Scientist+Craig+Venter+Has+Created+Artificial+Life/article16619.htm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10132762
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5981/958.full
It is certainly a great feat of science to take structures already existing in a living thing and make an artificial “copy” under the supervision of conscious beings, under conscious conditions, as the result of years of laboratory research. But IT IS DEFINITELY NOT EVOLUTION. No DNA or protein has been created out of nothing, and no new information that did not exist before has been added to the system. Instead of using scientific advances that have nothing to do with evolution, Darwinists should first explain how a single protein might have come into being by chance. That is the great question that terrifies Darwinists and that they can never answer. Therefore, all the Darwinist speculation about artificial copies and clones is completely specious.
s.56
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2730251.stm
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2008/11/200811187292180817.html
s.58
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
Nature, 20 Sep 2001
New Scientist, 24 May 2003
New Scientist, 11-12 July 2008
http://io9.com/#!5403595/one-gene-tweak-could-make-chimps-talk
New Scientist, 3 May 2008
s.59
New Scientist, 19 April 2008
New Scientist, 03 November 2007
Scientific American, August 2002
One of the best-known Darwinist propaganda tactics is to inundate the people they have indoctrinated with detail and to distract them from the real issue – the fact that evolution is a fraud – by means of false claims. Darwinists manufacture fictitious and ludicrous reports, giving the impression that everything about evolution has been proved and all that remains is detail such as hiccupping being inherited from such or such an animal or whether a whale turned into an elephant. It is easy to mislead uninformed people with such reports. The person in question will not then think of investigating whether there is any evidence that actually corroborates evolution. Because people swamped in detail are distracted from researching the true facts and remain under the Darwinist spell.
s.61
It is the “soul” that makes a living thing human, not its external appearance. Darwinists seek to cover that fact up. Yet the fact that human beings possess a soul is one of the greatest dilemmas facing Darwinists and does away with all their claims about the supposed evolution of man.
s.62
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
19 September 2006
Science, 28 May 2004
New Scientist, 8 March 2008
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0831_050831_chimp_genes.html
Science, 24 Feb 2004
s.63
28 October 2010
Nature, 28 October 2004
www.guardian.co.uk
Washington Post, 13 October 2007
The fact that a chimpanzee can make tools, laugh like a human when tickled or show affection toward its young is no evidence that it is “in the process of becoming human.” Physical similarities can never be proof of evolution. Even a difference of 0.001% between two life forms is a gigantic molecular gulf that Darwinists can never bridge. But even if a chimpanzee was identical to a human being in physical appearance, it could still never be human because it has no soul. Therefore, Darwinist propaganda, examples of which can be seen in these captions, are a gigantic fraud.
s.64
No academic staff member in any university in the world questions Darwinism.
s.65
Just a few of the professors and scientists who have lost their jobs for questioning the theory of evolution.
s.66
REPORTS OF THE DARWINIST DICTATORSHIP
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=405909
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1055597/Church-makes--8216-ludicrous-8217-apology-Charles-Darwin--126-years-death.html
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/09/15/anglican-church-owes-darwin-an-apology-senior-clergyman-says/
S.67
Time, 30 April 2001
New Scientist, 19 April 2008
Irish Times, 21 July 2007
The Darwinist dictatorship has taken over the whole world. Since it is imposed by that dictatorship, evolution is protected under national laws in all countries of the world. It is almost impossible to oppose the theory of evolution or question its validity. Those who do question it are immediately identified and silenced. Mass pressure is brought to be through the press under the control of the Darwinist dictatorship, public opinion is set in motion and a huge deterrent campaign is set in motion against the person or body questioning evolution. Fear is the sole reason why professors continue teaching in universities, a conference was held in the Vatican, the home of the Pope, and people have issued apologies to Darwin. The theory of evolution, the worst fraud of the last 150 years, spread across the whole world and its hypnotic effect was cast over vast masses of people through these techniques employed by the Darwinist dictatorship.
s.68
The scourges inflicted on mankind by cruel philosophical movements of Darwinist origins have led to the deaths of tens of millions of innocent people.
s.74
REPORTS OF THE DARWINIST DICTATORSHIP
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090310/full/news.2009.150.html
http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/domestic/11189047.asp?scr=1
Minister who questioned evolution removed from post
HaberTurk, 26.02.2011
http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/67115/striking-protest-by-metu-to-the-tubitak-regarding-the-darwin-censor-.html
Protests to TRT, Enemy of Darwin
Birgün, 4 December 2009
s.75
http://ww.bianet.org/bianet/freedom-of-expression/113054-darwin-censored-at-scientific-councils-magazine
http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?load=detay&link=169462
GLOBAL CENSURE
Posta, 12. 03. 2009
http://www.turks.us/article.php?story=20090504070626603
If a professor one day announces that he does not believe in evolution, he knows that his whole career will come to an end, that he will be spurned by family and friends, that he will be defamed and subjected to an intensive smear campaign, that he will never again find work because of the negative reports spread about him and that he will be crushed in psychological terms. Because of that intense psychological pressure, a great many professors are forced to give the impression of believing in evolution, even though they do not. This policy of exclusion aimed at people who reject Darwinism is perhaps the most effective psychological technique to which Darwinists resort. Evolution is a huge fraud that people are forced to espouse through threats, exclusion, negative propaganda and hooligan methods.
s.77
A report in the British Guardian newspaper that only 25% of Britons were shown to believe in evolution following a poll in Great Britain was quickly changed on the paper’s web site to read that half the country’s population did not believe in evolution.
One of the largest polls conducted showed that Turkey heads the list of countries rejecting evolution. Turkey is followed by the USA.
s.79
The collapse of the theory of evolution and the fact of Creation conference series
Switzerland
France – Paris
Germany
More than 200 conferences on the collapse of the theory of evolution held around the world and attended by large numbers of people have greatly upset Darwinists. This great success has terrified them. The use of the term “... it does not bother us” is intended to neutralize and help them cope with that enormous defeat.
s.80
FALSE NEWS REPORTS
Sydney Morning, 9 April 2010
New Scientist, 13 April 2008
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/01/28/us-china-dinosaur-bird-idUSTRE60R62F20100128
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090519-missing-link-found.html
S.81
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/04/07/welcome-to-the-family-missing-link.html#
The Detroit News, 9 April 2010
A new link in evolution
Sabah, 10. 04. 2010
Great news, we have an ancestor
Star, 26 March 2010
New evidence of the dinosaur-bird connection
NTVMSNBC, 11 May 2010
Whenever there are effective activities regarding the collapse of Darwinism, whenever conferences are held, books distributed or TV programs made, Darwinists always attempt to neutralize that effect by saying “we are not bothered.” Then they try to make good the damage by inventing another “missing link” report. They try to give the impression that this global defeat has not affected them. But the fact is they are in a state of panic. They have realized their trickery of the last 150 years will be exposed. They are aware they are headed toward total collapse. The “missing link” reports they produce so keenly are in fact their ideology’s death throes. But they can now see that even these will do them no good.
s.83
IMAGINARY
Time, 9 August 2004
Nebraska Man is the greatest evidence of Darwinists’ reconstruction deceptions. Darwinists had no hesitations over depicting the fictitious Nebraska Man and a whole social setting “on the basis of a single pig tooth.”